墮胎合乎道德嗎？－由湯姆森觀點論之 | a defense of abortion中文
The Abortion Controversy: On Thomson's Defense of Abortion. 作者: 邱娜瑩. 貢獻者: 鄭光明. Cheng, Kuang Ming 邱娜瑩. 關鍵詞: 墮胎倫理學反墮胎. Abortion主頁登入Post-Print關於學術集成English正體中文文學院學位論文Item研究者學系學術產出文章檢視/開啟(457)書目匯出EndnoteRIS格式資料匯出Bibtex格式資料匯出引文資訊無doi欄位資料顯示引文資訊社群sharingTAIR相關學術產出>SimpleRecord>FullRecord欄位名稱題名: 墮胎合乎道德嗎？－由湯姆森觀點論之TheAbortionControversy:OnThomson’sDefenseofAbortion作者: 邱娜瑩貢獻者: 鄭光明Cheng,KuangMing邱娜瑩關鍵詞: 墮胎倫理學反墮胎AbortionEthicsAnti-abortion日期: 2013上傳時間: 2015-09-0116:16:45(UTC+8)描述.abstract: 墮胎的道德爭議一直是倫理學的重要課題。
美國哲學家茱蒂絲．湯姆森在一九七一年發表〈為墮胎辯護〉一文，這篇論文不但試圖反駁反對墮胎論者的立場，湯姆森藉由著名的小提琴家思想實驗，以女性的身體自主權為基礎論證墮胎並非是道德上不可被允許的行為。
本文研究〈為墮胎辯護〉該文之論點，並探討針對此文的批評爭端，接著藉由反駁對〈為墮胎辯護〉之批評，進一步為〈為墮胎辯護〉一文辯護。
最後，本文同意湯姆森之主張：墮胎並非道德上不可被允許之行為；並呼籲人們在道德議題上公平地審視墮胎爭議。
ThemoraldebateonabortionhasbeenahotissueinEthics.In1971,AmericanphilosopherJudithJavisThomsonlaunchedherfamousthesis‘ADefenseofAbortion’inwhichshearguedagainstanti-abortionists.Bytheviolinistthoughtexperiment,shebeganwithwomen’sbodilyautonomyasherbasicargumentandclaimedthatabortionisnotmorallyimpermissible.MythesisherestudiedThomson’sviewonabortionanddiscussedthecriticsthat‘ADefenseofAbortion’evoked.Furthermore,Itrytofightbackthosecriticsanddefensefor“ADefenseofAbortion.”Finally,thisthesisagreesThomson’sclaim:Abortionisnotmorallyimpermissible,andsuggestthatweshouldfairlyexaminethedebateonabortion.參考文獻: Baer,J.(1999).Ourlivesbeforethelaw:constructingafeministjurisprudence.Princeton,N.J.:PrincetonUniversityPress.Beckwith,F.(1994).ArgumentsfromtheBodilyRights:ACriticalAnalysis.In PojmanandBeckwith,eds.(1998).TheAbortionControversy:AReader(pp.132–150).London:JonesandBartlettPublishers.Boonin-Vail,D.(1997).ADefenseof“ADefenseofAbortion”:OntheResponsibilityObjectiontoThomson’sArgument.Ethics,107,2:286-313.Brody,B.(1971).AbortionandtheLaw.TheJournalofPhilosophy,68,12:357-369Brody,B.(1972).TheMoralityofAbortion.Philosophy&PublicAffairs,1,3:335-340.Langer,R.(1992).AbortionandtheRighttoPrivacy.JournalofSocialPhilosophy,23,2:23-51.Noonan,J.(199
美國哲學家茱蒂絲．湯姆森在一九七一年發表〈為墮胎辯護〉一文，這篇論文不但試圖反駁反對墮胎論者的立場，湯姆森藉由著名的小提琴家思想實驗，以女性的身體自主權為基礎論證墮胎並非是道德上不可被允許的行為。
本文研究〈為墮胎辯護〉該文之論點，並探討針對此文的批評爭端，接著藉由反駁對〈為墮胎辯護〉之批評，進一步為〈為墮胎辯護〉一文辯護。
最後，本文同意湯姆森之主張：墮胎並非道德上不可被允許之行為；並呼籲人們在道德議題上公平地審視墮胎爭議。
ThemoraldebateonabortionhasbeenahotissueinEthics.In1971,AmericanphilosopherJudithJavisThomsonlaunchedherfamousthesis‘ADefenseofAbortion’inwhichshearguedagainstanti-abortionists.Bytheviolinistthoughtexperiment,shebeganwithwomen’sbodilyautonomyasherbasicargumentandclaimedthatabortionisnotmorallyimpermissible.MythesisherestudiedThomson’sviewonabortionanddiscussedthecriticsthat‘ADefenseofAbortion’evoked.Furthermore,Itrytofightbackthosecriticsanddefensefor“ADefenseofAbortion.”Finally,thisthesisagreesThomson’sclaim:Abortionisnotmorallyimpermissible,andsuggestthatweshouldfairlyexaminethedebateonabortion.參考文獻: Baer,J.(1999).Ourlivesbeforethelaw:constructingafeministjurisprudence.Princeton,N.J.:PrincetonUniversityPress.Beckwith,F.(1994).ArgumentsfromtheBodilyRights:ACriticalAnalysis.In PojmanandBeckwith,eds.(1998).TheAbortionControversy:AReader(pp.132–150).London:JonesandBartlettPublishers.Boonin-Vail,D.(1997).ADefenseof“ADefenseofAbortion”:OntheResponsibilityObjectiontoThomson’sArgument.Ethics,107,2:286-313.Brody,B.(1971).AbortionandtheLaw.TheJournalofPhilosophy,68,12:357-369Brody,B.(1972).TheMoralityofAbortion.Philosophy&PublicAffairs,1,3:335-340.Langer,R.(1992).AbortionandtheRighttoPrivacy.JournalofSocialPhilosophy,23,2:23-51.Noonan,J.(199